Beyond Belief
- Community UCC
- Jun 3
- 6 min read
June 1
I invite you to join me now taking some deeper breaths, letting ourselves
arrive a bit more fully, giving thanks for the gift of being alive here. And as
you are moved join me in Psalm 19. God may the words of my mouth and
the meditations of all our hearts be acceptable in your sight, our rock and
our redeemer. Amen.
Standing on the second floor of the Hagia Sophia Mosque in Istanbul last
summer, I wondered how close we really were. Our adorable, history-loving
guide Sahmet, delighted in the details. As I squinted to see the exquisite 5th
Century mosaics, Sahmet said with accented perfect English that the First
Council of Constantinople happened here, well at least near here, on this
very site where we were in the year 381. Because this most beautiful
mosque was once the biggest church in the world and what is now modern-
day Turkey was the site of the conversations and councils whose
statements would go on to determine what has become known now as the
“true” version of Christianity. At the second Council, they took the words
from the first Council in Nicaea and finalized them, solidifying their answers
to the some of the questions of the day. In the year 325, in what is now
called Iznik, 300 bishops answered the summons of the Emperor
Constantine. It was time to get all of the men in line; it was time to silence
some of the disagreements about whether Jesus was begotten or born like
the rest of us, whether the trinity was sort of pagan with three separate
entities, who are connected- were they really just 3 gods in disguise some
wondered? It is a weird doctrine, isn’t it?
These men gathered for the longest church meeting ever. They met for 3
months! May-July to work out the wording. The Emperor was present for
the whole time and what Constantine cared about was consolidating power
of course so I imagine those Bishops didn’t do much disagreeing with him.
Eventually they got in line.
And that day standing in the mosque on the second floor with my head
covered and filled with new questions, when our guide Sahmet then said
we were proximate to this most important meeting of men, I was giddy and
I couldn’t wait to read more. I found myself wondering who was not invited
but who eavesdropped from the sides. I know I would gladly be willing to
serve up some wine and pita and dates if I knew I could eavesdrop. Among
the men disagreeing openly were two Bishops, Arius and Athanasius and
basically Athanasius won, so between their first and second council
meetings, Bishop Athanasius in the year 367 sent out a letter telling all of
Christendom which texts were going to count as official and be included in
the biblical cannon. Only a short list made the cut and that list of 27 is what
we have today and so that Bishop maybe had more power than anyone in
all of Christian history. Those rogue monks didn’t destroy all of them.
But before he narrowed it down to 27, there were hundreds of Christian
texts in circulation, all kinds of different ideas floating around, different
practices and liturgies, different ways of living our Jesus’ teachings, but in
order to support the new creed, any letters with opposing views, would
need to be eliminated. They were ordered to be destroyed, but thank
goodness, many of them were just hidden really well, like the Gospel of
Thomas that you heard from earlier. What else? Let’s name some. The
Gospel of Mary. The Gospel of Phillip. Thunder Perfect Mind. Pistis Sophia.
But the ones that didn’t align and didn’t support the thinking in the Nicene
Creed needed to be eliminated. Part of what I have learned, which
confirmed what I have thought for a while is that many of the edits made by
these men, edits of ideas and texts and practices and stories, changed
some of the original intent. I think they reduced Christianity too much, made
it into a set of beliefs, instead of a path to transformation. And I think that
the worst most harmful expressions of Christianity on the loose right now
show this perfectly. It is a Christianity that almost has the heart cut right out.
It is a Christianity about feeling right, instead of being love. It is a
Christianity that is about dominating, instead of emptying and including.
This weird story that you heard from the Book of Acts is believed to be some
of the oldest writings that we did get included in the New Testament in the Bible.
You will see we get that statement of belief, do you believe? And many
point to that story as an example of what we are supposed to do as Christians.
Get more people to think a certain way.
In my opinion, it seems to me that too much has been made out of Paul’s
words. Do you know Paul never even met Jesus? So much of what is
terrible about Christianity comes from Paul. Some scholars argue that
much of what became known as the dominant version of Christianity should
really be called Paulism. The texts about covering women’s heads and not
speaking in church comes from the letters attributed to Paul. My French
friend Bernard believes strongly that Paul is a fallen angel. He reminded
me that Paul watched Stephen get stoned to death. Paul got some things
wrong, but we built a lot around Paul and the letters and community
attributed to him.
For 1700 years, we have been told to accept that what the 300 Bishops
decided is the true version of the faith. We have been told that their
decisions about the heart of Jesus’ teachings were the correct ones- their
decisions about which texts were to be seen as official, all the things that
they decided. But what if they were wrong? What if they left some important
things out? For reasons of their ego and the need for more power. A
Christianity with a beautiful diversity of expression is harder to control,
right?!
Jesus offered us a path, an integration of the head and the heart, a way
toward metanoia, repentance, an internal turning around. And while it is so
much easier to make it all about a heaven somewhere else, as we heard
from the Gospel of Thomas, I think part of what Jesus was getting at is that
it’s “It’s already spread out over the earth…” It’s here, but we miss it.
In the Book of Acts, they are told that they need to believe that Jesus is
who they say he is, and that’s how they will experience salvation. Some
Christians point to this as an example that what matters is a certain set of
words, the Jesus prayer, saying them right, saying them in the right order.
But to me, what matters just as much in this story is that those who were
hurting had their wounds cleaned and those were hungry were fed. What
matters is how they were welcomed fully into the community. Just today
Father Richard Rohr wrote that, “The Christian Eucharist was supposed to
be an act to model equality and inclusivity. But many turned the holy meal
into an exclusionary game, a religiously sanctioned declaration and division
of groups into worthy and unworthy.”
The Gospel of Thomas records Jesus as saying, “the kingdom is within you
and outside of you” which to me means it part that the journey it is a
constant back and forth, between the head and the heart, the centering and
the doing, the anchoring and the moving, the rational and irrational. I think
he meant it to be a both/and kind of thing. And I don’t think Jesus would
have appreciated the whole thing being reduced to a single creed. What
about you?
The correction that Christianity needs is this: The goal is not to be right, it is
to be whole and to support others in getting there too! It is about healing
and seeing the world in a certain way; it is seeing the heaven that is spread
out all over, already. It is time to shift away from a Christianity rooted in the
false externalities of authority from somewhere else, from a God that is far
off instead of an energy right here, beliefs instead of being present in the
world. It is time to reclaim what Jesus intended! It is a both/and faith. the
kin-dom is within you and outside of you…”
Communal Reflection
How do you live your faith beyond belief? How could our church more fully
live from both the head and the heart?
The kingdom is within you and outside of you. May it be so. Amen!

Comments